Re: Implications of Recent Developments in Network Science
Brett Hall <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:08:51 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.physics.fabric-of-reality |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 13/02/2013, at 20:07, "Alan Forrester" <alanmichaelforrester-gM/[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11 Feb 2013, at 11:41, JAG jaguarnight2012-/[email protected]> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "hibbsa" wrote: > >> Here's the extra implication to the domain of 'philosphy of science' as > >> I see it. > > > > Greetings to all..... > > > > not exactyly a respond to the topic discussed here but here is another real-LEGIT implication to the domain of philosophy of science (that is, according to Hume's following idea): > > > > "How is 'experimental reasoning' about causes and effects itself > > justified? In terms of deduction? that is impossible since the > > conclusion of inductive arguments are not deductively derivable from > > their premises. In terms of experimental reasoning? that is arguing > > in circle." > > -Hume > > It isn't justified. Justification is unnecessary and impossible. See "The Beginning of Infinity" by David Deutsch and "Realism and the Aim of Science" by Karl Popper. > > Alan > And see also The Fabric of Reality, the title of the book from which this list draws its own name. Specifically, read chapter 3 and perhaps then come back here with questions. Brett. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]