What's New Friday May 5, 2006

"What's New" <[email protected]> Fri, 5 May 2006 16:36:50 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.science.physics.whatsnew
Message-ID <LISTSERV%[email protected]>
WHAT'S NEW   Robert L. Park   Friday, 5 May 06   Washington, DC  

1. THE DARWIN CODE: WILL THE "INTELLIGENT DESIGNER" BE REVEALED? 
Our story opens with the grisly defeat of the eight members of
the Dover Area School Board who were up for reelection.  Behind
their demise, we now learn, is a shadowy organization called the
Discovery Institute, which is sworn to suppress the secret
identity of the "Intelligent Designer."  Just "teach the
controversy," warns the founder of the Discovery Institute, Bruce
Chapman.  Otherwise people might think the argument has something
to do with religion instead of pure science.  He blames the Dover
School Board.  To convince others not to reveal the identity of
the designer, the Discovery Institute has rushed into print with
a new book "Traipsing Into Evolution," in which their legal
experts analyze the impact of Kitzmiller v. Dover. 

2. THE POLYGRAPH: THE ANIMAL THAT TALKS FREQUENTLY TELLS LIES.
Unfortunately, so does the polygraph.  It's been 18 years since
WN wrote that the polygraph "cannot tell a lie from the sex act"
http://bobpark.org/WN88/wn030488.html , and Congress barred
polygraph use by private employers.  Twelve years later the
National Academy of Sciences concurred in "The Polygraph and Lie
Detection," (NAS Press, 2003).  Nevertheless, the Washington Post
reported Monday that the CIA, the FBI and other federal agencies
are using the polygraph more than ever.  It is "a pivotal tool in
the CIA's effort to identify leakers after embarrassing
disclosures about government anti-terrorism tactics."

3. PUBLIC ACCESS: SENATE BILL WOULD REQUIRE POSTING ON INTERNET. 
A year ago, a new NIH policy asked researchers on NIH grants to
submit their results to a public Web site within one year of
publication.  A leading advocate of free access, former NIH
director Harold Varmus, said he would have preferred "required"
rather than "asked."  In fact, only 4 percent of grant recipients
bothered.  But a Senate bill introduced Tuesday would indeed
"require" results of federally funded research be posted on the
internet http://bobpark.org/WN05/wn020405.html .  The Association
of American Publishers opposes it, but the public pays for it --
and for publishing it -- and should not have to pay to see it.

4. CLIMATE CHANGE: FEDERAL STUDY RESOLVES DISPUTE OVER WARMING. 
For more than a decade, scientists reported an apparent
discrepancy between rates of warming at the surface and in the
troposphere.  Warming deniers argued that it cast doubt on the
whole climate change picture.  Now the federal Climate Change
Science Program, convened by the Bush administration, concludes
that there is no conflict.  Moreover, there is clear evidence of
human influence on the climate system.  In the meantime, viral
diseases, including the West Nile virus, are moving north, and
malaria is climbing the mountains in Africa and South America.

THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND.
Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the
University of Maryland, but they should be.
---
Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.bobpark.org
What's New is moving to a different listserver and our
subscription process has changed. To change your subscription
status please visit this link:
http://listserv.umd.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=bobparks-whatsnew&A=1