What's New Robert L. Park 18 March 2011
Robert Park <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:06:49 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.physics.whatsnew |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTSERV%[email protected]> |
WHAT=92S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 Mar 2011 Washington, DC 1. BAD WEEK: WE MUST FOCUS ON HELPING THE PEOPLE OF JAPAN. In yesterday's New York Times, science reporter Bill Broad covered the=20 projected movement of the radiation plume by the UN=92s Comprehensive Tes= t=20 Ban Treaty Organization. The forecast is based on patterns of Pacific=20 winds and, =94the predicted path is likely to change as weather patterns=20 shift." Weather patterns always shift, but for the US any radiation from= =20 the plume will be down to a safe level. What is a "safe" level? It's ti= me=20 to repeat my "radiation-hormesis" rant. 2. HORMESIS: THE LINEAR NO-THRESHOLD MODEL MUST BE WRONG. Airline crews experience a high total-radiation exposure. But the exposu= re=20 of airline crews is spread over many years, while Chernobyl survivors got= a=20 concentrated dose. Statistically they are not distinguished. Do the=20 derivatives matter? According to a story in the news this week, Chernoby= l=20 survivors today suffer cancer at about the same rate as others their age.= =20 The same is true of Hiroshima survivors. If true, it would seem to suppo= rt=20 the radiation-hormesis thesis. "Hormesis" refers to things that are toxi= c=20 in large doses, but harmless or even beneficial in small doses. Trace=20 amounts of selenium, for example, are essential for cell function of=20 animals. But selenium salts in larger doses, are highly toxic. Airline=20 pilots or not, we are all exposed to background levels of ionizing=20 radiation every day of our lives. We do not all succumb to cancer. It=20 seems there is a repair mechanism that compares neighboring strands of DN= A=20 and patches up damage. The comparison can work only if damaged strands a= re=20 isolated. If the damage rate is very high, the same repair mechanism cou= ld=20 multiply the damage. 3. MAXWELL: THE SESQUICENTENNIAL OF MAXWELLS EQUATIONS. Maxwell=92s equations were published 150 years ago this month in=20 Philosophical Magazine. This week they are honored in a Nature editorial= =20 as a "bold unifying leap." When first exposed to Maxwell=92s equations a= s a=20 student I considered giving up physics. Not because I couldn't understan= d=20 Maxwell=92s equations, but because I realized that I could never compete = on=20 that level. But I soon realized that there was only one Maxwell. 4. DEFORESTATION: WOODSMAN, SPARE THAT TREE, BUT AXE THE ACRONYMS. =20 Andy White of the Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI), says we need,=20 Growing Restoration, Employment and Energy Now (GREEN), which is crucial=20 for the success of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest=20 Degradation (REDD). =20 5. MESSENGER: NASA SPACECRAFT IS IN MERCURY ORBIT. Congratulations! It took six years of looping around solar planets,=20 including Earth, to enter Mercury orbit perfectly. NASA does planets=20 really well. Acronyms are another matter. The spacecraft's poetic=20 sounding name turns out to be a labored acronym: MErcury Surface, Space=20 ENvironment, GEochemistry and Ranging.=20 6. DALLAS: THE APS MARCH MEETING NEXT WEEK. I'll be there to give an invited talk about what's new in Voodoo Science,= =20 Thursday, March 24 at 8:36AM, in C1.=20 THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the University of Maryland, but they should be. --- Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.bobpark.org What's New is moving to a different listserver and our subscription process has changed. To change your subscription status please visit this link: http://listserv.umd.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=3Dbobparks-whatsnew&A=3D1