What's New Robert L. Park 6 May 2012
Robert Park <[email protected]> Sun, 6 May 2012 17:35:17 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.physics.whatsnew |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTSERV%[email protected]> |
WHAT=92S NEW Robert L. Park Sunday, 6 May 2012 Washington, DC 1. ALBERT WHO? DEAD PHYSICIST DISPELS MOBILE-PHONE MYTH.=20 According to news reports last week: "There is still no evidence of harm = to=20 health from mobile-phone technologies," or other wireless devices such as= =20 Wi-Fi. A study for the UK's Health Protection Agency (HPA) is said to be= =20 the most complete review yet and new evidence is still being examined,=20= according to Professor Anthony Swerdlow of the Institute of Cancer=20 Research, who chaired the study. I once had a rubber stamp made that=20 said: "More research is needed," since it=92s found at the end of every=20= science paper. The unanswered question is why anyone thought microwave=20= radiation might be a cancer agent in the first place? Cancer is linked t= o=20 the formation of mutant strands of DNA. More than 100 years ago in his=20= 1905 paper on the photoelectric effect, Albert Einstein predicted an abru= pt=20 threshold for photoemission at about 5 eV, just above the lovely blue lim= it=20 of the visible spectrum, demonstrating wave-particle duality. He was=20 awarded the 1923 Physics Nobel Prize. It=92s also the threshold for the=20= emission of invisible ultraviolet radiation that causes hideous skin=20 cancers. The cancer threshold, is therefore, 1 million times higher than= =20 the microwaves band. The same enormous mistake was made in the 1980s when= =20 epidemiologists falsely warned that exposure to power line emission can=20= cause cancer. Power lines abruptly stopped causing cancer in 1997 after=20= the U.S. National Cancer Institute conducted a better study. It=92s painf= ul=20 to witness this sad history being replayed with mobile-phone radiation.=20= Aside: My apologies to regular readers who have heard this 20 times befor= e,=20 but it has not gotten through to everyone. 2.ASTEROID PROSPECTING: WHAT'S HOLDING UP A SPACE-AGE GOLD RUSH. There was a front-page article by Joel Achenbach in the Washington Post=20= last week about Planetary Resources, the world's first asteroid mining=20= business, started by space visionary Peter Diamandis and his colleague Er= ic=20 Anderson. Deep-pocket investors are said to be hyperventilating. Why=20 wouldn't they? Untold thousands of asteroids are whizzing around the Sun= =20 right now =96 and they're free. Just leave your business card on an aster= oid=20 and it's yours. But, although asteroids are free, "whizzing" is not. Wha= t=20 are these guys thinking? You must chase asteroids down to extract stuff=20= like platinum and diamonds, if there is any, and haul it to Earth.=20 Meanwhile the price of rocket fuel is up and tiny errors in trajectory=20= could lead to huge damage suits or start wars. But why bother? Some of t= he=20 best asteroids are already here; Earth has been collecting them for eons.= =20 Just look for craters and start digging. Consider the Chicxulub asteroid=20= buried beneath the Yucat=E1n Peninsula. It got rid of the dinosaurs 65=20= million years ago, clearing the way for the evolution of Homo sapiens.=20= =20 Mining the Chicxulub asteroid should keep Planetary Resources busy for=20= centuries. Asteroids already have a really bad rap, but I think Chicxulub= =20 may be seen as evidence that God is a businessman.=20 THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the University of Maryland, but they should be. --- Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.bobpark.org What's New is moving to a different listserver and our subscription process has changed. To change your subscription status please visit this link: http://listserv.umd.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=3Dbobparks-whatsnew&A=3D1