What's New Robert L. Park 16 Jan 2013
Robert Park <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:41:50 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.physics.whatsnew |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTSERV%[email protected]> |
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Wednesday, 16 Jan 2013 Washington, DC=20= 1. STEM CELL: SUPREME COURT WOULD RATHER NOT TALK ABOUT IT. Last week the court refused to keep the government out of embryonic-stem-= cell research, which is thought by many to be the most promising approach= =20 to the treatment of numerous human diseases. About 20 years ago, however,= =20 anti-abortionists pushed a bill through Congress banning the use of feder= al=20 funds for research on human embryos. They believed the Holy Ghost bestow= s=20 a soul on the zygote at the moment of conception, making the zygote a=20 person (see What=92s New, 8 Nov 98). The Obama administration long ago=20= rejected this preposterous superstition, but it was kept alive by an appe= al=20 to the Supreme Court. Rejection of the appeal assures continued funding,= =20 but the delay, contrived on superstitious grounds, may have cost many liv= es. 2. BREAKTHROUGH: THE HIGGS WAS THE TOP BREAKTHROUGH IN 2012. As it does each year, the journal Science picked 10 breakthroughs to mark= =20 the advance of science in 2012. In the 21 Dec 2012 issue, Editor-in-Chie= f=20 Bruce Alberts reported that the Higgs boson had been chosen as the "Top=20= Science Breakthrough in 2012." There is no immediate application for the= =20 Higgs particle in sight, but it represents a huge advance in our=20 understanding of why the universe came out the way it did. Science seeks= =20 to trace the chain of cause-and-effect relationships back to a presumed=20= first-cause. The Higgs boson is causally linked to the formation of the=20= material universe. The discovery was made with CERN=92s Large Hadron Coll= ider=20 at an operating budget of about $1 billion per year and the efforts of=20= thousands of scientists. By comparison the war in Afghanistan has so far= =20 cost the US $1.2 trillion and 2000 lives with no tangible benefits? 3. KYOTO: WHY DID THE EMISSIONS PROTOCOL END IN TOTAL FAILURE? On 1 Jan 2013 the Kyoto Protocol came to its scheduled termination. It's = a=20 good thing; greenhouse gas emissions had only come up in response to Kyot= o.=20 Hmmm. Could the UN solve the obesity problem with an international=20 agreement to limit food production? In an increasingly industrialized=20 society the only way to effectively reduce emissions is to reduce the=20 population.=20=20 THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the University of Maryland, but they should be. --- Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.bobpark.org What's New is moving to a different listserver and our subscription process has changed. To change your subscription status please visit this link: http://listserv.umd.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=3Dbobparks-whatsnew&A=3D1