Re: [Orocos-users] [Orocos] Orocos Toolchain 2.6.0 Released !

On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Peter Soetens wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Paul Chavent <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello Peter.
>>
>> Some words about the last release :
>>
>> (1) Thank you for having managed this new release.
>>
>> (2) The downloads of the archives didn't work today : http://people.mech.kuleuven.be/~orocos/pub/stable/toolchain/v2.6.0/orocos-toolchain-2.6.0-src.tar.bz2 returns 404. Is it still possible to access independent archives of rtt and ocl ?
>
> There is an issue with the file server

Fibre channel controller of our SAN broke down.... :-(((

Herman

> which caused all our new
> uploads to be not available on the webserver. We've reported it and
> hope it will be resolved soon. You can get rtt and ocl as archives
> from github or gitorious. The complete toolchain we could try to
> upload to a different place and see if we can manually move it on the
> webserver...
>
>>
>> (3) I'm sorry, but i have submitted a wrong patch for the bug 979. I thought that you have read my comment http://bugs.orocos.org/show_bug.cgi?id=979#c6 , but the master repo still contains the error (a class keyword to replace by a struct).
>
> I did, but then I forgot.. patch is king  :-) Fixed on gitorious.
>
>>
>> (4) The bug 950 have been partially merged. I added some modifications (see http://bugs.orocos.org/show_bug.cgi?id=950#c8). Do you have some reviews on it ?
>
> What really sucks is that the rttlua deployer is called 'deployer' and
> the taskbrowser deployer is called 'Deployer'.  Changing either of
> both is going to break a lot of scripts.
>
> Especially since every rttlua script contains a line like 'dp =
> tc:getPeer("deployer")'
>
> What we could do is try to use the alias mechanism such that
> 'deployer' and 'Deployer' resolve to the same TC, *but keep the
> official name as 'deployer' in rttlua*.
>
> For example (note that the DC is created as "deployer"):
>
> diff --git a/lua/LuaComponent.cpp b/lua/LuaComponent.cpp
> index 0a56197..22d03b9 100644
> --- a/lua/LuaComponent.cpp
> +++ b/lua/LuaComponent.cpp
> @@ -345,6 +345,8 @@ int ORO_main(int argc, char** argv)
>        dc = new DeploymentComponent("deployer");
>
>        lua.connectPeers(dc);
> +    // Alias for rttscript compatibility.
> +    lua.addPeer(dc, "Deployer");
>
>        /* run init file */
>        wordexp(INIT_FILE, &init_exp, 0);
>
> Would this work for you ? Or is it also for the
> CorbaDeploymentComponent + NamingService necessary ? How do you set
> the the name of different CorbaDeploymentComponents ???
>
>>
>> (3) The bug 926 haven't been merged. Do you have suggestions to make the patch acceptable ?
>
> It was. I just assumed it had been merged already, and somehow also
> overlooked the bug report. This is annoying since it adds a virtual
> function to the ChannelElements. Is this patch in use on the rock-rtt
> repository ?
>
>>
>> (5) I think you can close bug 853
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
> -- 
> Orocos-Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev
>

--
   KU Leuven, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Research Group
     <http://people.mech.kuleuven.be/~bruyninc> Tel: +32 16 328056
   Vice-President Research euRobotics <http://www.eu-robotics.net>
   Open RObot COntrol Software <http://www.orocos.org>
   Associate Editor JOSER <http://www.joser.org>, IJRR <http://www.ijrr.org>
-- 
Orocos-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev