Re: [ros-users] [Orocos-users] Joint controller manager
Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <alpine.DEB.2.02.1301310806590.5505__7667.61319614506$1359616203$gmane$org@pma-12-013> |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Tully Foote wrote: > Hi Herman, > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Herman Bruyninckx > <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Adolfo Rodríguez Tsouroukdissian wrote: > > [...] > On another note, since a few people have shown an interest to > participate in this > effort, how about keeping design discussions here, but using > the ROS/Orocos Robot > Control Special Interest Group [2] > > > A forum is an order of magnitude less reactive than a forum... > > created by Jonathan to discuss the > who-does-what-and-when, and not spam this list as much?. So sign up > if you want to > participate!. > > > I don't see why this very technically grounded and socially well conducted > discussion can considered to be spam... The only suggestion I would make is > to continue on the -dev mailinglists, exactly because of the technicalities > and the focus on new developments. > > > Jon and Adolfo's suggestion is the ROS equivalent of a more classic -dev list. Because > of the wide variety of topic of interest to the greater ROS community, we setup these > special interest groups to help maintain focus and allow people to choose to join > conversations they care about, and not fill everyone's inbox with long detailed > discussions of topics not of interest to them. Our choice to structure things this way > is based on feedback from the past that when the mailing list becomes too high volume > people unsubscribe, even core active developers would auto archive the mailing list if > not unsubscribe. > > It might be good to switch to the SIG from ros-users and if the orocos community would > prefer we could use the orocos-dev mailing list as well. I would prefer that, indeed. And I just did replace the orocos-users address by orocos-dev. > Generally double posting > conversations leads to accidentally only replying to one of the forums leaving a bunch > of people out of the loop until it's noticed. Also it makes searching for content much > harder as there ends up requiring two places to look through the history in case > something is relevant but not crossposted. So...? Inevitable, I think, when there is no obvious "best" place to have a particular discussion... > Tully Herman > ...I'll now go back and do my part checking out the code > Jonathan shared yesterday. > > Adolfo, > > [1] https://github.com/pal-robotics/orocos_controller_manager > [2] > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/ros-robot-control-sig > > Best, > Wim > -- Orocos-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev