Re: ReferenceDataSource vs LateReferenceDataSource
Peter Soetens <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMYDobXrUV4G+qhtLZxuV-GpN5KH7RxNwo5YUhB9U63YR6JvDw@mail.gmail.com> |
2013/3/25 Sylvain Joyeux <[email protected]>: > mid-2011, ReferenceDataSource gained a setReference method which made it > very very much look like LateReferenceDataSource. > > Am I missing something, or would it be possible to deprecate one of the > two ? Yep, it's a dupe. Both are in internal, so we can play as we like. I'd prefer to keep (Const)ReferenceDataSource, also rttlua uses it too. We might migrate/inline some of the LateRef methods into this class... but we can't typedef it. Other suggestions ? Peter -- Orocos-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev