Re: Orocos / Catkin

This might be a bug related to this topic:

In the ROS Hydro release of python_orocos_kdl it seems like the a CMake
configuration file is missing. This is the error I get when trying to build
a package depending on python_orocos_kdl:

CMake Error at /opt/ros/hydro/share/catkin/cmake/catkinConfig.cmake:72
(find_package):
  Could not find a configuration file for package python_orocos_kdl.

  Set python_orocos_kdl_DIR to the directory containing a CMake
configuration
  file for python_orocos_kdl.  The file will have one of the following
names:

    python_orocos_kdlConfig.cmake
    python_orocos_kdl-config.cmake

Note that this file exists for the orocos_kdl package. I'm not sure, if
this is a problem of the package or something went wrong while releasing it.


Regards,
Marcus



On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Ruben Smits
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Jon,
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Jonathan Bohren <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ruben,
>>
>> [...]
>
>>
>> I noticed you have some merge requests up on gitorious for Catkin
>> integration with Orocos. What's the status of that?
>>
>
> I've been able to compile the entire orocos_toolchain using
> catkin_make_isolated. This means I converted all packages back to plain
> cmake packages and provided a package.xml files and CMakeLists.txt for
> packages that still need to be installed. This makes it possible to build
> the entire toolchain with catkin_make_isolated and install it nicely.
>
> I've successfully used it to build the toolchain on Mac OSX and Ubuntu.
>
>
>> I think Catkin is almost ready for prime-time (once they add a unified
>> <depend> tag and catkin_simple) but I know there might be some interest in
>> making Orocos still build in a rosbuild environmnet. Do you think rosbuild
>> should still be supported?
>>
>>
> Personally I think we can safely drop rosbuild support for hydro and
> groovy. Especially since for catkin we only use plain cmake and add a
> non-intrusive package.xml file.
>
> But the most critical question is how this will influence the workflow of
> users. I've not yet used the converted toolchain enough in my own workflow
> to give a good answer.
>
> I have no idea what other developers think of this. Let's hear them out ;)
>
>
>> Thanks! I hope all is well,
>> -j
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Bohren
>> Laboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics
>> http://dscl.lcsr.jhu.edu/People/JonathanBohren
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ruben Smits, Phd
> Chief Technology Officer
> Intermodalics BVBA
> +32479511786
> www.intermodalics.eu
>
> --
> Orocos-Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev
>
>


-- 
Marcus Liebhardt
Control Engineer
Yujin Robot
주소: 대한민국 서울시 금천구 가산동 345-30 남성프라자 #601, 153-023.
Address: Door #601, Namsung-Plaza, 345-30 Gasan-dong, Guemcheon-gu, Seoul,
153-023, Republic of Korea
Website: http://www.yujinrobot.com
Email: [email protected]
Phone: +82-70-46577073

-- 
Orocos-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev