Re: New versions and rodmap
S Roderick <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 5, 2013, at 18:44 , Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > >> Hi, > >> do you have some plan to release a orocos 2.7 soon? And kdl? >> >> in another mail Ruben commented about stable branch of kdl.. >>> AFAIK there is none currently. We probable could create a stable >>> branch from the latest release tag. >> >> do you know when? >> > > This is not a direct answer to your question, but a related remark: I think > it is time to organize a one-day face-to-face meeting with a handful of > "experts" and discuss the Orocos and KDL roadmaps... Especially since there > are two new kids on the block (or rather, they are almost there...) Markus' > microblocs and Azamat's new hybrid dynammics solver (which will _not_ be a > traditional Class library, but rather a microblocs application). In > addition, there is the "model-driven engineering" evolution that should be > consolidated, that is, with a minimum of the integration of not-so-new > formal models for: > - geometry: frames and kinematic chains > - physical units > > In my view, all of the above can (should!) be done in a way that does not > compromise the ongoing Orocos RTT and KDL evolutions: they are > _complements_, not replacements. But I do expect them to have an influence > on how developers should _use_ RTT and KDL... > > I can offer some travel support to participants with "to good to miss" > contirbutions to such a developers meeting :-) If it is possible to organize this meeting so that international developers could call/Skype in, then that would be very beneficial. Cheers S -- Orocos-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev