Re: rFSM catkinization

On Mi, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:41:32 +0100, Ruben Smits wrote:
>Hi Enea,
>
>On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Enea Scioni <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Ruben,
>>> >
>>> > On Do, Feb 13, 2014 at 04:28:47 +0100, Ruben Smits wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> we've cleanup our fork to remove the ugly guard changes we did. But we
>>> >> did do a catkinization of rFSM. It just adds functionality, we do not
>>> >> break any old use-cases.
>>
>> That is not true. It also breaks also the compatibility w.r.t. old ROS
>> versions (Fuerte, Electric...)...(Nick and me just had this experience).
>> Please, fix it....
>
>we forgot that people are still using those old ROS distributions ;),
>we will resurrect the manifest.xml for you guys.

Argh. In five years we'll have more rosbuild crap in the source tree
than source. :(

Markus
-- 
Orocos-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev