Re: Alternative Transports / Master Server
Janosch Machowinski <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:52:51 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 11.11.2014 um 15:47 schrieb Sylvain Joyeux: > 2014-11-11 12:13 GMT-02:00 Janosch Machowinski <[email protected]>: >> Hey, >> we are currently looking into adding new transport layers to orocos. >> We haven't choosen the concrete implementation or candidate yet, >> the candidates so far are : >> - LTP/BT (licklider transmission protocol / Bundle protocol) >> - ICE >> - DDS >> - zeroMq >> >> Noe we stumbled over the issue with the "Master Server" >> for now, there is the implicit master server, being the >> corba nameserver. > Can you explain what you mean by that ? There is no "master" server in > RTT the way there is one in e.g. ROS. The only server that exists is a > name server, which is a very narrowed down definition of "master". > > The corba client class currently registers tasks on the corba name > server (which made sense given that CORBA was the only name service), > but there's nothing in RTT that mandates it (not even in the CORBA > transport). I agree, but to be fair, without the ability to lookup up other components, orocos would be pretty useless. My proposal was more aiming in the direction, to have a common interface for component lookup, independent of the transport layer that one uses. Apart from this there is the second question, if it makes sense, to add code that serves component lookup request in a transport independent way. This would be useful if building transports on pure protocols. It was already pointed out, there are case, were the transport middleware already provides the functionality of the name lookup. In this cases this code would obviously not be needed. > > It is the job of the deployment tool (either the OCL deployer or > orogen-generated deployments) to register the task wherever they feel > like. I.e. it is a tooling concern (whichever toolchain you use is > really what mandates the task to be registered somewhere specific), > definitely not a transport concern. Sure, but it would be great, to do something like ./component --useDDS or ./component --useCORBA without having to maintain two independent code base on the tooling side. Janosch -- Dipl. Inf. Janosch Machowinski SAR- & Sicherheitsrobotik Universität Bremen FB 3 - Mathematik und Informatik AG Robotik Robert-Hooke-Straße 1 28359 Bremen, Germany Zentrale: +49 421 178 45-6611 Besuchsadresse der Nebengeschäftstelle: Robert-Hooke-Straße 5 28359 Bremen, Germany Tel.: +49 421 178 45-6614 Empfang: +49 421 178 45-6600 Fax: +49 421 178 45-4150 E-Mail: [email protected] Weitere Informationen: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/robotik -- Orocos-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev