Re: What's going on with versionning ?
Ruben Smits <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:50:08 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN8PhbnRsZSuW5-J_6qViw5aHj3MJsJrAbuaooLXL7T=JunXjg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Willy Lambert <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2015-03-17 15:07 GMT+01:00 Ruben Smits <[email protected]>: > >> This page should be updated: >> http://www.orocos.org/wiki/orocos/toolchain/getting-started and include >> the list we have below. >> >> R. >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Ruben Smits < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It should go very close to here: http://www.orocos.org/orocos/toolchain >>> IMO >>> >> > How do we edit this page ? I can modify the wiki, but this page seems to > work differently. > > You're right, I don't know by heart, but we can edit the getting started wiki page instead? R. > >>> R. >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Willy Lambert <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-03-04 9:56 GMT+01:00 Peter Soetens <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Hi Willy, >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Willy Lambert < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > Hi all, >>>>> > >>>>> > I just saw a reference to toolchain-2.8 branch in another discussion >>>>> on the >>>>> > ML, could someone explain what's going on ? >>>>> >>>>> Maybe everybody was looking at me... >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > The 2.7 version seem to have had hard time with multiple "rc". Is >>>>> this a way >>>>> > to go out of a dead end ? >>>>> >>>>> 2.7 was only released as Debian packages in the ROS repositories, >>>>> currently at 2.7.0-9. >>>>> I must admit I also can't find these version tags on github, where >>>>> they should be. >>>>> >>>>> The lack of announcements of these releases on the mailing lists is >>>>> clearly very confusing. The reason for this is >>>>> that the release procedure (but also the review of branches/patches) I >>>>> could do until 2.6 is >>>>> not working anymore for me. From a timing/effort perspective. >>>>> >>>>> > I'm also interested in the ROS/Orocos version compatibility change. >>>>> As far >>>>> > as I know 2.7 was compatible with Ros::Indigo. >>>>> >>>>> It is, if you build from source. If you want to use the ROS .deb >>>>> binaries, you're limited to what is >>>>> in the ros repositories: >>>>> >>>>> fuerte : toolchain-2.6 >>>>> hydro : toolchain-2.7 >>>>> indigo : toolchain-2.8 >>>>> >>>>> So we only create binaries for one Orocos major version per ROS >>>>> release. >>>>> >>>>> toolchain-2.8 branched from master last year, but afaikt it's still in >>>>> sync with master. >>>>> >>>>> The majority of the changes of 2.7 vs 2.8 are on the 'extensions' >>>>> level, so not API's but extra >>>>> functionality. On the ROS extension side, lots of support was added to >>>>> be compatible with >>>>> the ROS primitives (so access/modify Orocos primitives using ROS >>>>> tools). On the orogen >>>>> side, lot of work was done to get the masters of orocos-toolchain back >>>>> in sync with the masters >>>>> of rock. That's also a major step forward. >>>>> >>>>> 2.8 and 2.7 are not binary compatible, but are source-level compatible. >>>>> >>>>> Finally, we discussed a few weeks ago to create release notes for this >>>>> 2.8 release, >>>>> and properly tag it, since we all agree that before it was better. But >>>>> I need more than a >>>>> few hours to prepare that the 'old way'. Many hours passed since, and >>>>> there always seems >>>>> to be a higher priority task in front of it. >>>>> >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thx a lot for clarify this. I think we should add this compatibility >>>> table in some public place : >>>> " >>>> fuerte : toolchain-2.6 >>>> hydro : toolchain-2.7 >>>> indigo : toolchain-2.8 >>>> " >>>> >>>> I didn't find any relevant place, does anyone have an idea ? >>>> >>>> It seems that some of the core dev team have had private chat on this, >>>> it would be great to share such discussions ;p. If I understand well the >>>> team decided to change the way publication is done with 2.7 for a new >>>> lightweight way, but no communication has been done on this... Maybe >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Orocos-Dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ruben Smits, Roboticist - Founder >>> +32 479 511 786 >>> Intermodalics - Kapeldreef 60, 3001 Heverlee - BELGIUM >>> www.intermodalics.eu >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ruben Smits, Roboticist - Founder >> +32 479 511 786 >> Intermodalics - Kapeldreef 60, 3001 Heverlee - BELGIUM >> www.intermodalics.eu >> > > -- Ruben Smits, Roboticist - Founder +32 479 511 786 Intermodalics - Kapeldreef 60, 3001 Heverlee - BELGIUM www.intermodalics.eu -- Orocos-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev