Re: Limitations with v2 port implementation
Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:10:24 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <alpine.DEB.2.11.1504081609420.13976@pma-12-013> |
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1506983097-1428502225=:13976 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Sylvain Joyeux wrote: >> Agreed, but it doesn=E2=80=99t solve the performance issue. > > Definitely not :(. > > Just for benchmarking sake, have you done some profiling ? Or have you > tried using a lock policy instead of lock-free. Lock-free is nice, but > it looks nasty from an instruction cache p.o.v. Why "instruction" cache, and not just "cache" in general...? > Sylvain Herman --8323329-1506983097-1428502225=:13976 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline -- Orocos-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev --8323329-1506983097-1428502225=:13976--