Re: Updated dataflow semantics for RTT

On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:

>> Which is exactly what RTT has become... I have met no-one the last couple
>> of years who "got it" when starting to use Orocos, and very few of them
>> changed their "legacy" to better practice designs...
>
> Mmmm ... do I/we(Rock users) count ?

I used "when _starting_ to use Orocos" and "the last couple of years" in
the same sentence, so you don't count! :-)

> As I said, it is a matter of community, i.e. providing the guidance
> and education for people to keep their system "clean". It's time
> consuming, but it is part of using any form of complex system.

I partially agree: RTT has a too complex design for the complexity it helps
people deal with. And that is _not_ going to change via the currently
suggested incremental changes. So, RTT will _not_ grow its community to the
size it might deserve. All this is speculation, of course.

> Sylvain

Herman
-- 
Orocos-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev