Re: [Core] Components design

Anthony Mallet <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user
Organization LAAS (CNRS) - Toulouse - France
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Henrik I. Christensen wrote :
| I am not sure I agree that we need a complete and unified ontology for
| module capabilities at this time. We need to develop this over time as
| modules are specified. I fear that an attempt to do this apriori is
| doomed to failure. We shoudl of course have a format for specification
| of the "service" offered by a module

Well I don't think we're doing that specification "a priori", because we
all have some exeprience on that topic.
Of course we must not tighten the specifications too much in the
beginning, to let things evolve :)


| Once Christian makes the document available I am happy to sit down and
| try to perform a synthesis (in English). I think Christian and I will
| make a proposal for the rest of you to critisize. 

Fine :)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.