RE: Open source robot controllers
Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109242045120.2584-100000@pc25-213.mech.kuleuven.ac.be> |
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Tiller, Michael (M.M.) wrote: [...] > > > > It could be interesting for you to take a look at modelica.org, for > > the modelling language. I do have some objections against the precise > > way they are doing things, but it's by far the most advanced thing at > > this instant. > > > A minor clarification. Modelica covers the kinds of requirements > you describe for connectors. In addition, there are a (currently > informal, I think) set of annotations that allow Modelica models and > hierarchies to be represented and connected graphically. These are > implemented by Dymola (http://www.dynasim.se) and MathModelica > (http://www.mathcore.com). Thanks for the clarification. But they don't have any open source implementation available, as far as I know? > Finally, Modelica goes beyond just requiring pairs of effort and > flow variables. For example, in multi-body systems it is often > necessary to express these quantities as vectors. This is of course a necessity for robotics. > Furthermore, in > thermodynamic system (my area) we often have far more complex > connectors where the flow and non-flow variables are not balanced. What do you mean with `not balanced'? [...} > My caution to anybody developing a control system tool is to not > forget about the plant. :-) Indeed! And this becomes more and more important as we are going towards _interaction_ between machines and humans... Herman