RE: Open source robot controllers
"Henrik I. Christensen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "HB" == Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]> writes: I am sorry guys but I fail to see the advantage of 20sim over Dymola. We could also write an open source viewer to Modellica. HB> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Stramigioli, S wrote: >> > I thought 20sim also was prorietary, wihch makes it >> inyteresting but > useless for our effort. >> >> As Dymula uses Modelica, 20sim uses Sidops which has the >> constructs and power port features I said before. 20sim is >> proprietary as Dymula, but Sidops is open and the 20sim team is >> busy writing a formal definition of Sidops which will be >> publically available. Right same story as Modellica/Dymola. Open standard, but non-open implemetation. HB> Ok, I didn't realise this :-) >> Furthermore, they are planning to make a free viewer/simulator >> available with which you can view/simulate somebodyelse's >> model, but you cannot change it and save it. Kind of an improvement, but it is not good enough for us. We need to be able to work on this and I will NOT rely on a commercial / closed system. HB> Will they allow us to write an open source version of this HB> viewer? (The OverFlow project that was mentioned on the HB> mailinglist yesterday would be a good point to start from... >> So I do believe it is worth having a look at it for our >> purpose. HB> Sure! Keep us informed about when there is something HB> available. Or about things they would be interested in in HB> discussing with us. I prefer open solutions. We need to build on this to make real progress! --Henrik