Re: answers cntd.
Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110011302330.20576-100000@pc25-213.mech.kuleuven.ac.be> |
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Cezary Zielinski wrote: [...] > What I think you are saying that the same set of sensor readings is > used both for servo control and trajectory generation and thus there > might be oposing reaction of both levels. If my understanding of the > problem is correct, then my answer is that you are probobly right - > there will be a conflict. Nevertheless I am not proposing such a > thing. My intension was that each level uses its own set of sensors > which will provide readings that will not produce conflicting > modifications. Ok, I understand. And that's also what I think defines the borders of a `component': _within_ a component, stability (and other proporties) are guaranteed (because there is a responsible procedure _in_ the component), while using feedback around the component is without real-time guarantees. (Unless the internal component is deterministic.) Herman