Re: answers cntd.

Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user
Message-ID <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110011302330.20576-100000@pc25-213.mech.kuleuven.ac.be>
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Cezary Zielinski wrote:

[...]
> What I think you are saying that the same set of sensor readings is
> used both for servo control and trajectory generation and thus there
> might be oposing reaction of both levels. If my understanding of the
> problem is correct, then my answer is that you are probobly right -
> there will be a conflict. Nevertheless I am not proposing such a
> thing. My intension was that each level uses its own set of sensors
> which will provide readings that will not produce conflicting
> modifications.

Ok, I understand. And that's also what I think defines the borders of
a `component': _within_ a component, stability (and other proporties)
are guaranteed (because there is a responsible procedure _in_ the
component), while using feedback around the component is without
real-time guarantees. (Unless the internal component is
deterministic.)


Herman
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.