Opinions about HyCharts...
Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112291050590.23367-100000@pc25-213.mech.kuleuven.ac.be> |
About the problem we discussed before, regarding a good modelling of system architecture and behaviour, I found some interesting reading on the concept of HyCharts, with more details on the home page of Thomas Stauner <http://www4.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~stauner/>, and with an extensive document (PhD Thesis) on <http://www4.in.tum.de/~stauner/papers/stauner-diss.ps.gz>. What are your opinions about this HyCharts approach? I like the explicit decomposition in architectural (structural) decomposition on the one hand, and the modelling of component behaviour on the other hand, because this is _very_ similar to the current state of the designs presented by LAAS and (not yet presented :-( ) by Leuven. Herman