Re: No exceptions!
Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203050014010.6632-100000@pc25-213.mech.kuleuven.ac.be> |
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Anders Orebäck wrote: > I guess we cannot use exceptions in the API:s and object definitions since > the realtime parts cannot handle it? > (At least that was one of the things I picked up from Peters seminar here at > KTH last Thursday.) > > This means we normally have to use the return values for status information > instead of returning more "useful" stuff;-( > > ./Anders If we strive for 100% reuse of the communication API, yes. But that should maybe not be the major goal to aim for. After all, realtime is only a small part of all robotics software, so it should not compromise the development of the non-realtime parts. Of course, the software _patterns_ of communication should be the same, whenever possible. Herman