Re: RE: New subscriber to List
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208161549230.5513-100000@srv04.mech.kuleuven.ac.be> |
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 [email protected] wrote: > Just joined this list and didn't see much happening yet. Is > everyone on summer vacation? Not everybody :-) > I have an interest in helping to develop GPL'd software for > robotics. For a few years now, I have had an idea for a new > protocol. I call it RIMCP (Robotics Inter Module Control Protocol) > and it would be similar "in principle" to http. Orocos is building infrastructure from the bottom up, which is a tedious job. Currently, most emphasis is on the real-time control part, and basic sequencing and communication. The ``http level'' has not yet been reached :-( > This new protocol would allow robot limbs from different > manufacturers to learn from each other and eventually function > normally without having to rewrite ANY software. That would be revolutionary :-) At this moment, robot manufacturers are completely incompatible, and getting data out of their controllers is most of the time very difficult, to say the least... And forget about _setting_ the parameters that you have learned. But maybe I misunderstood your idea... > Each limb would contain its own CPU, memory, and I/O chips. > Communication would be done via either a 10/100BaseT connection or a > fiber optic connection, dependin g on the data needs. For example, > a 3D vision system might require a fiber optic connection with the > "master CPU". I see that you are talking about future robotic devices. Then I agree with you :-) > There would of course be a need for mfgs of robotics parts (or > limbs) to standardize the mechanical fittings where the limbs attach > to the main "torso" of the robot. I believe that this type of > development is the key to future practical robotics development. Of course that's the key! But robot manufacturers have no incentive to standardize anything. They will have to be forced. > After sharing this idea with another robotics enthusiast, he pointed > me to this website and list. I hope you have much success in your > efforts and am willing to help in any way I can. Fine! You could start with writing down your wishlist, so that we can see whether the current work is addressing these needs. Herman -- K.U.Leuven, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Research Group <http://people.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/~bruyninc> Tel: +32 16 322480