Re: First draft of "OROCOS II" proposal...
Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306261028010.19650-100000@srv04.mech.kuleuven.ac.be> |
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Henrik I. Christensen wrote: > On torsdag, jun 26, 2003, at 09:36 Europe/Stockholm, Herman Bruyninckx > wrote: > > > Mind you: in my opinion, the core of the project is > > robotics-independent, but robotics will of course be a major > > application target. > > > Does that imply that you do *NOT* see OROCOS(++) as related to EURON in > the future? I.e. if it is not robotics releated is there a need for any > EURON involvement then? > Of course there are relations! Robotics will (certainly for me) be a (the?) major applications area. But the core of the project is to develop infrastructure that is useful for other application areas too. But what exactly do you mean with "EURON involvement"? Participation of _people_ from the robotics community, or formal integration with the EURON NoE? I am not _asking_ for involvement, but it would be welcome of course :-) Anyway, I do not claim "ownership" of this proposal: others are free to "steal" ideas and go for more focused projects (STREPS), for which there is lots of room too. Maybe it turns out that "the community" finds that my suggestions are "too broad", so I won't find support for my proposal draft; so be it :-) I know that defining the most appropriate scope of the proposal is not easy. Anyway don't forget that the proposal has to comply to the goals of the EU call, and in this case it would be "open development platforms" (most probably), and not a robotics-oriented call. -- K.U.Leuven, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Research Group <http://people.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/~bruyninc> Tel: +32 16 322480