Specification updates and API freeze suggestions
Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:54:22 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407010932320.959@roble> |
Dear Orocos partners, It's about time to close the ranks and work towards a unified 1.0 release. At least for some parts of Orocos. (As a matter of fact, not all parts _have_ to follow the same release schedule.) I worked hard at getting the documentation updated for all things needed to define a proper motion API for simple robots, such as a 6R industrial robot. I give an outline of the changes and "decisions" below, but please consult the cited documents for concrete criticism. I revised the design motivations behind the choice of API in <http://www.orocos.org/documentation/decoupling.html> <http://www.orocos.org/documentation/deep-shallow-api.html> Especially the section on programming idioms should be critisized... Then, the kinematic chain and motion documents got a good treatment: <http://www.orocos.org/documentation/kindyn-doc.html> <http://www.orocos.org/documentation/motion-api.html> These contain an "almost final" API suggestion, which I will force to become final if no decent discussion follows :-) Finally, the documents on building a simple application <http://www.orocos.org/documentation/applications-doc.html> got some updates, but not enough... So, I will not be able to react to criticism in the next ten days or so, so give all these things a good thought, and use them to remove the "forks" that currently exist in the orocos code! PS Some documents need time till midnight to get updated on the webpage... Herman -- K.U.Leuven, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Research Group <http://people.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/~bruyninc> Tel: +32 16 322480