Re: [Skate] The Uni-Koeln awards 2016
| Newsgroups | gmane.sports.speedskating |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Op 21/04/2016 om 13:32 schreef Lars Finsen [email protected] [Speed_skating]: >> 21. apr. 2016 kl. 12.04 skreiv 'Gerrit Stevens' gerstenat-FeDmaE5TyfFmR6Xm/[email protected] [Speed_skating] <[email protected]>: >> >> I do too, so that means every nomination (also in parentheses) has been seconded. > I cannot accept wholesale seconding. If you think any of the unseconded nominations are really relevant to the poll, please mention them by name. Including irrelevant candidates to the poll will tempt someone, for example fans of that particular skater, to waste their votes instead of participating in the poll to elect the real best skater in that category. I also support that every nomination between brackets should be seconded. Do you define the rules for the KOLN skatelist or do we? This is Cinquanta behaviour. If it is a majorite vote it is 3 against one. There never have been fangroups here that massivley voted for irrelevant candidates. If it happens we can talk about it. BTW this email list is virtually dead after 21 years of excistence Keessie ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------