Re: Re: LOX clenliness (was: peroxide compatibility question)
John Carmack <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.technology.erps |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 11:06 PM 3/28/2004 -0500, you wrote: >My understanding is that under GOX or LOX flow within piping, anything >organic >will instantly combust, which will cause *any* metal plumbing next to it to >also >burn, which will instantly rupture the piping and cause a bad day. We have >not >yet attempted any use of LOX or GOX, although it's a clear favorite in terms >of >performance and cost, if you're willing to deal with cryogenic oxidizers. > >Dan I'm pretty sure that the "fingeprint in lox" problem is an exaggeration, just like the "splash some peroxide on your clothes and you are a human torch" exaggeration. John Carmack