Re: Re: LOX clenliness (was: peroxide compatibility question)

John Carmack <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.technology.erps
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 11:06 PM 3/28/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>My understanding is that under GOX or LOX flow within piping, anything
>organic
>will instantly combust, which will cause *any* metal plumbing next to it to
>also
>burn, which will instantly rupture the piping and cause a bad day.   We have
>not
>yet attempted any use of LOX or GOX, although it's a clear favorite in terms
>of
>performance and cost, if you're willing to deal with cryogenic oxidizers.
>
>Dan

I'm pretty sure that the "fingeprint in lox" problem is an exaggeration, 
just like the "splash some peroxide on your clothes and you are a human 
torch" exaggeration.

John Carmack
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.