Fw: tank slosh baffle comment

Russell McMahon <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.technology.erps
Message-ID <04dc01c4323e$e24c5130$7c01a8c0@y2k>
> From my experience with ballast tanks on a ship, where sloshing produces
> undersirable rolling movement of the entire ship: Seems like four vertical
> partition baffles would work well. Looking down from the top of the
> tank,they would be arranged in the shape of the pound sign,#.
> They would prevent the bulk of the propellant from moving to one
> side of the tank and thus allowing only a short Center of Gravity shift
>. Rings would only slow the shifting motion of the propellant, not
> preventing it as much as vertical baffles which would compartmentalize
> the tanks.

What about making such baffles from a moderately extensible (ie "stretchy")
material or even one with SOME ability to pass fluid such that energy is
dissipated in the process and/or you get damping? Such a system could
(perhaps) be both lighter weight and more effective than rigid baffles. The
potential for gas entrainmentn (frothing) of the fluid may need to be
considered. A really sophisticated version could attempt dynamic damping,
but the law of diminishing returns (aka ygrenys) probably applies

"Shade cloth" (subject to compatibility with fluid involved) may be a good
material to experiment with :-)



        Russell McMahon
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.