Re: [Fwd: [AR] First Torrino Scale 2 object...]

Michael Wallis wrote:

>On Thu 23.Dec'04 at 11:09:42 -0800, Dave W wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>From arocket... -dw
>>
>>Paul Breed wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/
>>>
>>>Paul
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>[email protected]
>>>http://exrocketry.net/mailman/listinfo/arocket
>>>      
>>>
>
>Interesting. Based on 36 observations over 6 months? That's not a lot
>of data points, even if it is spread out. I wonder if they've done an
>historical search yet. 2004 MN4 may be on older images. Certainly
>worth keeping an eye on. We've got about 24 years if the preliminary
>numbers hold up. My guess is they won't, but I'm an optimist.
>
> 
>
Neodys 
<http://newton.dm.unipi.it/cgi-bin/neodys/neoibo?objects:2004MN4;main> 
shows 55 observations over the same span, though the impactor table says 
35. It also shows a higher probability of impact (0.593% instead of 0.34%).

Anything with a positive Palermo scale value is "interesting." I could 
care less about the Torino scale  :)

_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFByyIVmvPkVW5ztpERAlPAAJ0d+BoeKkoX+ZQi9QRtknQkR48B7QCffxaK
sntXyzIf8GJYsq0UzXaTt70=
=LVmM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----