Re: Orbital Mechanics
David Weinshenker <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:17:54 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.technology.erps |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > For instance, to put the Hubble (v â?^ 7.575 km/s) in the ISS orbital plane > (inclination change of 23.17 deg), where it would presumably be okay to service > it by shuttle, you'd need about 3.04 km/s--about enough to send it to Mars! > It's not an impossible number, howeverâ??basically, you'd need to send up about > 1.72 times the HST's weight of 3.04 km/s-exhaust-velocity fuel and a small > rocket engine which you fire at every node for a few months or so (the HST won't > take much acceleration). When it comes down to it, this brute force approach > might be a lot simpler than the robotic repair mission and even cheaper now that > they're talking billions for the robot! So what's the required delta-V for a "minimal mothball orbit-raising mission" - i.e., boost it to an orbital altitude such that the orbit won't decay any time soon, and it can safely be powered down and allowed to "go passive" pending a later full-repair mission? This would be much easier than a plane change for an acceleration-sensitive object like the Hubble, since it could done with a gentle continuous thrust. (I wonder if the numbers work out for some sort of electric propulsion.) -dave w