Re: Congress Passes H-Prize

Bill Clawson <[email protected]> Fri, 12 May 2006 11:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.technology.erps
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It's a loser technology for many reasons.  Most
especially because if it's storage density problems,
and hydrogen generation issues -- the most common
method of creating hydrogen gas is by passing natural
gas through a reformer, so the end result is that your
shifting cars away from oil and into natural gas.  The
only interesting technology along the lines of
hydrogen generation that has caught my eye involves
titanium oxide ceramics used in a hydrogen generating
solar panel.  There are several links on the subject
if you search google with "titanium oxide hydrogen
solar".  Here is an example:

<http://www.b2i.us/profiles/investor/fullpage.asp?b=1&LangID=1&BzID=546&to=cp&ID=1285>



--- Sean Lynch <[email protected]> wrote:

> Michael Wallis wrote:
> >
> > WASHINGTON - Scientists, inventors and
> entrepreneurs will be able to
> > vie for a grand prize of $10 million, and smaller
> prizes reaching
> > millions of dollars, under House-passed
> legislation to encourage
> > research into hydrogen as an alternative fuel.
> >
> Hydrogen is obviously a loser technology. You know
> how I know? Congress
> picked it.
> > _______________________________________________
> ERPS-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vesta.wallis.com/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
>