Re: Congress Passes H-Prize
Bill Clawson <[email protected]> Fri, 12 May 2006 11:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.technology.erps |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It's a loser technology for many reasons. Most especially because if it's storage density problems, and hydrogen generation issues -- the most common method of creating hydrogen gas is by passing natural gas through a reformer, so the end result is that your shifting cars away from oil and into natural gas. The only interesting technology along the lines of hydrogen generation that has caught my eye involves titanium oxide ceramics used in a hydrogen generating solar panel. There are several links on the subject if you search google with "titanium oxide hydrogen solar". Here is an example: <http://www.b2i.us/profiles/investor/fullpage.asp?b=1&LangID=1&BzID=546&to=cp&ID=1285> --- Sean Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael Wallis wrote: > > > > WASHINGTON - Scientists, inventors and > entrepreneurs will be able to > > vie for a grand prize of $10 million, and smaller > prizes reaching > > millions of dollars, under House-passed > legislation to encourage > > research into hydrogen as an alternative fuel. > > > Hydrogen is obviously a loser technology. You know > how I know? Congress > picked it. > > _______________________________________________ > ERPS-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://vesta.wallis.com/mailman/listinfo/erps-list >