Re: Sparging
John Carmack <[email protected]> Tue, 16 May 2006 01:36:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.technology.erps |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> >B. I think the route we're pursuing will potentially yield extra-pure >(>98%) H2O2 with low impurity levels, as in the last batches XL-space >supplied before closing: and the "squeaky clean & wicked pure" stuff >has evident potential not only for catalytic work but also for potential >hypergolic combinations. (Everything I've encountered so far leads me >to the conclusion that if lower-concentration material is desired for >use with a particular catalyst, best results will be had with highly-purified >material (by way of a final freeze separation) diluted as needed, rather >than with H2O2 concentrated by evaporation directly up to the intended >strength (unless the evaporation starts with extremely low-solute material). > >This is not out of the question: the process used by Bengtsson of >"Peroxide Propulsion Systems" in Sweden involves running the H2O2 >in dilute aqueous solution through an ion-exchange "demineralizer" >as is used in preparing purified water: with solutes thus removed, >he then concentrates the solution by evaporation. I have said this several times in the past -- start with Solvay Ultra Pure at 50% concentration. It reads zero on a TDS meter, compared to 4 ppm for FMC propulsion grade. You could concentrate an awful lot of that and still be at extreme purity levels. We were getting it for $1 / lb in 500 lb drums. John Carmack