Re: Sparging
Alexander Mikhailov <[email protected]> Tue, 16 May 2006 12:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.technology.erps |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Michael Wallis <[email protected]> wrote: > > But then, we may not be doing things the way you > want to. If you've > got the $15K to spend and a stable, active area > where the aparatus can > be monitored, by all means use Juan's stuff. For us, > however, it's not > really an option. > They could be another option. If it is possible to find a place to run the sparger locally - some chemical laboratory, may be - and the equipment may be rented, or a cheaper version could be bought and assembled, then it's possible to produce enough HTP for, say, a whole project. A project of KISS scale would likely spend no more than 30 gallons of HTP, perhaps even less. Something similar... Sean, what about The Spike?.. What are the estimations? And what is the current active project, the next flying thing? After (or during) production the HTP can be transferred to the Rocket Ranch to keep it there. Now we only need to find how much HTP can be produced in a single session in the lab (if it can't run unattended), so to calculate the time scope and expences. Alexander __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com