Re: Mars peroxide
Mike Lorrey <[email protected]> Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.technology.erps |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There are significant problems with the "mars peroxide" story: a) it improperly assumes that a wetter, warmer, early Mars exhibited the same dust devil phenomena as well as the same UV levels at ground level as today. Logically, a warmer wetter denser atmosphere is going to filter out more UV, and have markedly different weather and climatological conditions as there exists today. b) wrt current day H2O2 production, if the sort of electrostatic phenomena exist around dust devils as is claimed by the theories, then the Mars Rovers, which have interacted with several dust devils, would have experienced significant electrical disturbances at the time of those encounters. Since they did not, then logically it means there is no such electrostatic phenomena that would create H2O2 in the current day. c) also, if such H2O2 existed in Mars dust, we would have seen significantly greater levels of corrosion of Rover components, particularly due to carbonic acid byproducts of H2O2 production from CO2 and H20. Since we haven't seen such corrosion, then it logically follows that there isn't any such phenomenon. --- Bill Clawson <[email protected]> wrote: > Tell me if I'm wrong here, but if the Martian soil is > anything like Mojave dirt, then wouldn't it stand to > reason that the Martian soil would be catalytic to > H202 and reduce the peroxide in the soil to about nil? > Wouldn't all that rust act as a catalyst? > > --- william jaeger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The availability of hydrogen peroxide in Martian > > soil won't be high > > enough to mine it. If the hypothetical production is > > dependent on water > > vapor, it will be extremely scarce. The amount that > > accumulates will > > level off at some minute contamination percent as > > (wind driven) motion > > of upper dust layers exposes the peroxide to solar > > UV and it breaks > > down. If the accumulation is large enough to produce > > the results seen in > > Viking experiments, we can set a lower limit to > > peroxide percent. 1% was > > mentioned. At that level how much soil would we have > > to turn over to > > accumulate a USABLE quantity say 10 tonnes? Too > > much I would guess. > > the man to ask would be Prof. John S lewis at U of A > > Tucson. > > Regards > > Bill Jaeger > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ERPS-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://vesta.wallis.com/mailman/listinfo/erps-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > ERPS-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://vesta.wallis.com/mailman/listinfo/erps-list > Mike Lorrey President, Lorrey Aerospace http://www.lorrey.biz Founder, Constitution Park Foundation Blog: http://intlib.blogspot.com