Re: ecovillage and sustainability

"E.Christopher Mare" <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:14:44 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.technology.sustainable.ecobalance
Message-ID <[email protected]>
HI John, 
I'm glad to see this 'theoretical ekistics' type discussion get some
airtime on the Pc site...

how these folks live so as to not repeat or
>re-invent the gossip/rumor/pettiness/etc. vicious cycles that have
>been/can
>be/still are one part of the historical "small town" experience.

Sure - the provincial or parochial qualities of "small town" scale or even
"small village" scale settlement, the tendency for 'narrow-mindedness' in
self-contained living situations. (That reminds me of J.S. Bach - a
provincial character for sure that tapped into a universal harmony.) But
will this really be a concern in 21st/22nd century ecovillages? With the
globalization of consciousness and information, the 'universal discussion'
is only a keyboard away. Also, what seems to be evolving is a sort of
migration of pollinating 'cultural ambassadors' - traveling from
ecovillage to ecovillage disseminating ideas, songs, customs, etc.

As far as "gossip/rumor/pettiness" - this is social activity that
Critchfield ("Villages" - 1983) describes as ubiquitous but serving a
purpose: maintaining the status quo of social cohesion to ensure
sustainability. In the village, from what I understand, peer pressure
replaces allopathic authority, such as police forces. The thought of
banishment from the group is enough to keep most people behaving with
civility.

Of course, as a North American, I might just crack under such close
scrutiny; I'm used to having so much privacy! That's OK, once I crack I
can give up the notion of having a 'self' that needed to be protected.

My experience with "city scale" settlement is that there are so many
strangers that I tend to shut down and close myself off; it may be
dangerous. There is a good discussion of scale in "A Pattern Language" -
Communities of 7000.

All the best to you,
Chris Mare,
VDI


<[email protected]> writes:
>Aloha,
>
>> "Village-scale' is most sustainable
>> [I propose] because it has the characteristics of 1) it is small enough
>so
>> that everybody is known - there are no 'strangers' - a social organic
>> unity results;
>
>Important question is, how do these folks teach each other to regard the
>inevitable 'strangers' who will appear from 'outside' their particular
>ecovillage?
>
>There are infinite possibilities, and some will obviously lead us 'round
>again
>to feudal lords and walled cities, etc.whereas others will not.
>
>Another important question is >
>
>
>
>John Schinnerer - MA, Whole Systems Design
>------------------------------------------
>- Eco-Living -
>Design & Technology Services
>People - Place - Learning - Integration
>john-/Gao9/[email protected]
>http://eco-living.net
>
>------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe to ecobalance go to:
>http://www.ecovillage.org/ecobalance
>------------------------------------------------
>




------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe to ecobalance go to:
http://www.ecovillage.org/ecobalance
------------------------------------------------