Re: ecovillage and sustainability
[email protected] Tue, 4 May 2004 11:21:02 EDT
| Newsgroups | gmane.technology.sustainable.ecobalance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Actually, I am very much drawn to many of Ken Wilber's ideas, which are truly a visionary and far-reaching, yet logically rigorous synthesis of what we now know about our holarchic inner and outer worlds. And his critique of the self-indulgent narcissism of "Boomer" culture is very much on target. But I have some difficulty with his personality, as it comes through in his books. As a friend of mine observes, "he has an ego the size of the universe." This is, perhaps, an occupational hazard for one with such an impressive and disciplined intellectual scope. He can prevail in any argument he encounters, and it obviously has gone to his head, so that he believes he is infallible, and shows contempt for those with different ideas than his. The question of "leadership" is an excellent case in point, but I feel that it is possible--though rare--to have inspired leadership while minimizing the egomania that is the perennial occupational hazard of leaders--especially spiritual leaders! Compare, for example, Thich Nhat Hanh's Plum Village with most other Guru-directed spiritual communities (such as Rajneesh, Adi Da or whatever his current honorifics are, Muktananda, etc.) In the latter, the guru is revered, even worshiped, as a kind of earthly deity, and, more often than not, has abused this adulation, either by amassing great wealth, insulating himself from criticism, enforcing rigid and servile obedience, and surrounding himself with the trappings of royalty. In contrast, Thich Nhat Hanh, while remaining the unchallenged spiritual leader of Plum Village and its satellite communities, is for all that still a humble and devout monk with a quiet, self-effacing sense of humor in his Dharma talks. He is revered--but not worshiped. This is why I can freely claim discipleship of Thich Nhat Hanh, while simultaneously, without trepidation, making my own decisions about which of his precepts (e.g.his ban on alcohol) reflect a small instance of his all-too-human rigidity, rather than any divine mandate in human flesh. Most charismatic spiritual leaders we read of, past and present, have a message which boils down to "follow me!" The Buddha, in contrast, left his disciples with the injunction to "be a light unto yourself." This is how I reconcile being an adamant free-thinker, yet a Dharma disciple in the lineage of Thich Nhat Hanh. So while egoless leadership may be ultimately an oxymoron, we can nevertheless seek out those leaders who clearly demonstrate, in both word and action, pursuit of the asymptotic goal of egolessness--spiritual leaders like Thich Nhat Hanh and the Dalai Lama, or political leaders like Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, or even Kofi Annan. "Wherefore by their fruits shall ye know them." Best wishes, Tom