Re: dharma gaia center
forest <[email protected]> Sun, 09 May 2004 08:16:47 -1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.technology.sustainable.ecobalance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BCC3996E.4CEB%[email protected]> |
on 5/8/04 5:23 PM, John Schinnerer at john-/Gao9/[email protected] wrote: > Allowing a single person to veto another member might enable them to miss out > on some important learning that that person brings them. That is, if *only* > one person in the community is so irritated that they ask a probate to leave, > it is likely that that one person has something to learn from their > irritation. Letting them alone make the decision to send their "mirror" away > might not be an optimal strategy overall. i think/feel it would be alright if done in the consensus format....if one individual in a community developed a habit of being the first to always turn someone away we might question their motives or involvement in the community and eventually they might be asked to leave....tho with consensus our argument would have to be so good and diplomatic and convincing that they would naturally agree and leave rather than be forced... -- forest [email protected] http://www.lavazone2.com/forest/ ------------------------------------------------ To subscribe or unsubscribe to ecobalance go to: http://www.ecovillage.org/ecobalance ------------------------------------------------