Re: consensus child care"??? / wasAnother Bush Crime against humanity and Gaia
forest <[email protected]> Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:20:11 -1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.technology.sustainable.ecobalance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BE256ACA.717F%[email protected]> |
on 2/1/05 2:23 PM, Mitra at [email protected] wrote: > Ken > > Thats good to hear, I'd be interested to hear the experience of > people who've tried to continue to use Consensus (with no fallback to > voting) in a community which is pretty spread out (i.e. more like an > eco-village than a commune), and in a situation where relationships > have broken down. All the stories I've heard have been negative. many people idealize consensus, but are not really ready for the levels of responsibility and trust it requires to succeed....so, many attempts will fail in early or beginning stages....just like it says in bible, (no i am not a jesus freak really, but like the quote) "many are called but few are choosen" ( actually i prefer rather "but few make the choice to better fit this new age")..... one suggestion in larger eco-village situations is to decentralize consensus into several linked supportive neighborhood councils or pods of twelve or less within the larger eco-village, they could then support and link with the other smaller pods or groups in the eco-village by sending rotating representatives to a larger eco-village consensus council of twevle or less that met less regularly for matters that involved the whole village.... for the consensus purists like me out there, before final adoptions of agreements by this eco-village council, the representative could then go back to his neighborhood council and discuss and try and reach consensus in the smaller neighborhood groups before total adoption of agreement/s as a whole village is made.... or if trust was special already, we could trust the representative to represent the smaller neighborhood councils consensus and make his vote final at the eco-village council right away.... something along those lines anyway, never got to eco-village too much yet, reaching high trust levels of consensus with just a mate is quite a challenge in itself, eh????.... :-) start with two it seems and slowly slowly add one or two more to develop the higher trust levels that i feel are required for more formal type consensus to succeed....imh-bs formalized/organized/refined consensus is a spiritual evolving group mind experience/experiment that we have really only scratched the surface of, it can be refined to very interesting stituations and phenomena among high trust cooperative groups methinks/feels..... i am quite wary at this stage of life experience, but still passionate to succeed one of these lifetimes or another.... :-) ok, enough ramblin from the forest...aloha and peace, -- forest [email protected] http://www.lavazone2.com/forest/ ------------------------------------------------ To subscribe or unsubscribe to ecobalance go to: http://www.ecovillage.org/ecobalance ------------------------------------------------