Re: don't need no stinkin' concensus
John Schinnerer <john-/Gao9/[email protected]> Wed, 02 Feb 2005 11:16:15 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.technology.sustainable.ecobalance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Aloha, "Consensus," like "sustainable" and "green" and "democracy" and "religion" and "spirituality" and so on, is a pretty bankrupted word these days. Getting oneself wrapped around (attached to) particular words and terms and jargon appears to lead to (here so far at least) arguing over abstractions. I find it much more useful to look at what is actually being done (without having to attach a name to it) that "works" and "doesn't work" - in regards to human decision-making or whatever else is of interest. If some structure/process most often "works" in a particular context, I don't care what it's called. By "works" I mean "has consequences that one likes." By "doesn't work" I mean "has consequences that one does not like." hi ho, John S. -- John Schinnerer - MA, Whole Systems Design ------------------------------------------ - Eco-Living - Whole Systems Design Services People - Place - Learning - Integration john-/Gao9/[email protected] http://eco-living.net ------------------------------------------------ To subscribe or unsubscribe to ecobalance go to: http://www.ecovillage.org/ecobalance/index.html ------------------------------------------------