Re: manpage format fixes
Lars Kruse <[email protected]> Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:40:02 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.clearsilver.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20080329054002.189bf2e1@erker> |
Hi, > > the debian package checker lintian complained about some manpage format > > problems in the clearsilver package. > > > > Attached you find a patch that fixes these issues. > > So, the manpages are actually generated from the header comments using > the python script at scripts/document.py oh - good to know ... > I think most of these are just a matter of adding a concise description > to the "function name" portion, which I've added to the header files. yes - lintian reported these errors as "manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry". They seem to hinder mandb to create the keyword based index for these manpages. Thus the "apropos" (same as "man -k") and "whatis" features would not work for these packages. > Is there a name for the lint checker, is it something I can run myself > without creating a debian package? I have an ubuntu box which should > have it available. yes, it should be available in ubunty as "lintian". Just run "lintian ???.deb" to get the warning messages for a binary package. It does not work for a source tree. The mentioned warning messages occurred in the clearsilver-dev package 0.10.4-1. Lars