Re: DocBook Transclusion in xslTNG
Dave Pawson <[email protected]> Tue, 11 May 2021 11:02:48 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.apps |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEncD4dUTVHaOAf2YK5s_2EpXyxgBU-bB-j9zoadNhTMe1t5hA@mail.gmail.com> |
from your [1] https://docbook.org/docs/transclusion/transclusion.html https://docbook.org/docs/transclusion-requirements/ is 404 Norm? Should it be the 2010 version? https://docbook.org/docs/transclusion-requirements/transclusion-requirements.html regards On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 10:16, Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good morning (well, in this locale anyway), > > I set out to implement DocBook Transclusion in the DocBook xslTNG > Stylesheets the other day and discovered that a previous attempt to > implement it was already in place. > > It appears to have been an attempt to implement the previous draft of > DocBook Transclusion, not the most recent[1], and I don’t believe it > works. > > If you’re using DocBook Transclusion with the DocBook xslTNG Stylesheets > and you think it’s doing something useful, please let me know. > > I plan to revamp it completely in the next release. I’d be worried about > doing a backwards incompatible change except, as I said, I don’t think > the current implementation does anything remotely useful. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > [1] https://docbook.org/docs/transclusion/transclusion.html > > -- > Norman Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> > https://nwalsh.com/ > > > Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of men of old; seek what they > > sought.--Matsuo Basho -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.