Re: DocBook Transclusion in xslTNG

Dave Pawson <[email protected]> Tue, 11 May 2021 11:02:48 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.text.docbook.apps
Message-ID <CAEncD4dUTVHaOAf2YK5s_2EpXyxgBU-bB-j9zoadNhTMe1t5hA@mail.gmail.com>
from your [1] https://docbook.org/docs/transclusion/transclusion.html
https://docbook.org/docs/transclusion-requirements/   is 404 Norm?

Should it be the 2010 version?
https://docbook.org/docs/transclusion-requirements/transclusion-requirements.html

regards

On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 10:16, Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Good morning (well, in this locale anyway),
>
> I set out to implement DocBook Transclusion in the DocBook xslTNG
> Stylesheets the other day and discovered that a previous attempt to
> implement it was already in place.
>
> It appears to have been an attempt to implement the previous draft of
> DocBook Transclusion, not the most recent[1], and I don’t believe it
> works.
>
> If you’re using DocBook Transclusion with the DocBook xslTNG Stylesheets
> and you think it’s doing something useful, please let me know.
>
> I plan to revamp it completely in the next release. I’d be worried about
> doing a backwards incompatible change except, as I said, I don’t think
> the current implementation does anything remotely useful.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> [1] https://docbook.org/docs/transclusion/transclusion.html
>
> --
> Norman Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]>
> https://nwalsh.com/
>
> > Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of men of old; seek what they
> > sought.--Matsuo Basho



-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.