Re: Possible to use MetaPost input directly?
Steinar Bang <[email protected]> Sun, 04 May 2003 18:20:47 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.db2latex.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Probably a good idea |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> James Devenish <[email protected]>: > Huh? I thought you could just insert your graphics codes directly. Nope. It's a dia[1] drawing. I generate the .mp (MetaPost input files), and .mps (PostScript generated by MetaPost) files, with the following GNU makefile rule: %.mps: %.dia dia --nosplash --export-to-format=mp $< mpost $*.mp mv $(*F).1 $*.mps The .mp files are TeX, but I don't know if pdflatex has the neccessary macros loaded. Do you know? The .mps files are EPS, as far as I can tell, but EPS in a form that pdflatex can digest. I'm told pdflatex cannot digest arbitrary EPS files. > Alternatively, you could do something like this: > <mediaobject> > <textobject> > <phrase role="latex">\input{my.file}</phrase> > </textobject> > </mediaobject> Thanx. But there's still the scaling issue. And, I guess, not picking an <imageobject> found inside the <mediaobject>, instead of the <textobject>...? Why's the role on the <phrase> and not on the <textobject>? - Steinar PS as I've said earlier, this was just an idle thought, and not something I need. The .mps files work fine with pdflatex. So please don't spend time on it on my account. Of course, if you find this an interesting TeX-hack, I'm happy to assist in any way I can. :-) [1] Gnome graphical editor, http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf