Re: Re: [docbook] future of DocBook XML Schema (XSD)?

Tim Arnold <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.docbook.apps,gmane.text.docbook.misc
Message-ID <CA+O6OTAmiDoQx5MKiPpzHEVkHQ=S8u6LPo=p07WbS-zHj4ukyw@mail.gmail.com>
I don't use xsd either.
I use docbook.nvdl with the onvdl program.

thanks for asking!
--Tim


On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Dave Pawson <[email protected]> wrote:

> + for rng only.
> I can honestly say I've never used xml schema for docbook (or anything
> else for that matter)
>    I do validate many instances though, using Jing / oXygen
> regards
>
> On 18 October 2016 at 19:51, Bob Stayton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The DocBook Technical Committee is considering dropping the XML Schema
> > version of DocBook in a future version 6.  We would like to hear from any
> > members of the DocBook community who would be affected by this change.
> >
> > Let me be clear that this change is not on the horizon, but part of our
> long
> > term planning.  The DocBook TC takes great care in maintaining backwards
> > compatibility on point releases because we know how much the DocBook
> > community relies on stable sources.  When DocBook rolls to a new major
> > version number, we treat that as an opportunity to introduce changes that
> > are not backwards compatible.  The change from 4 to 5 was such.  If we
> > foresee such changes coming, we give the DocBook community very advanced
> > notice to prepare for them.
> >
> > We will continue to maintain the DocBook standard in RelaxNG with
> Schematron
> > rules, and will continue to generate a compatible DTD.
> >
> > However, the process of maintaining the XSD version of DocBook is proving
> > burdensome because it cannot be completely generated by a conversion
> > program, and requires manual tweaking.  Because we are not sure if
> anyone is
> > actually using the XSD version, we are wondering if this is worth the
> > effort.  If you are using it, or have tools that depend on XSD, please
> let
> > us know.
> >
> > You can reply directly to me if you don't want to discuss it on the
> mailing
> > list.
> >
> > --
> > Bob Stayton
> > Sagehill Enterprises
> > [email protected]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> Docbook FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.