Re: How to encode subfigures?

Have you tried table layout?
From the appearance, that would be most suitable.

HTH

On 8 July 2017 at 16:14, Thibaut Cuvelier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I am trying to convert LaTeX subfigures into DocBook, but I cannot find a
> way to do so. What I currently have is something like this:
>
> \begin{figure}
>     \centering
>     \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.45\textwidth}
>         \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{A}
>         \caption{Caption A}
>     \end{subfigure}
>     ~
>     \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.45\textwidth}
>         \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{B}
>         \caption{Caption B}
>     \end{subfigure}
>     \caption{Pictures}
> \end{figure}
>
> The result looks like this:
>
>     A                         B
>     Fig. 1.1: Caption A       Fig. 1.2: Caption B
>                 Fig 1: Pictures
>
> How can I encode something like this in proper DocBook? The only reference I
> could find is
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9177130/docbook-more-images-in-one-figure/39990292#39990292,
> but that really looks like bad DocBook in my opinion… Functionality-wise, I
> also have concerns about the way to make reference to a subfigure. Indeed,
> when putting xml:id at the mediaobject level, I cannot use xref in order to
> point to them:
>
> Don't know what gentext to create for xref to: "mediaobject"
>
> My DocBook example:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <?xml-model href="http://docbook.org/xml/5.1/rng/docbook.rng"
> schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
> <?xml-model href="http://docbook.org/xml/5.1/sch/docbook.sch"
> type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
> <article xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
>     xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" version="5.1">
>     <title>AE</title>
>     <para>Ref: <xref linkend="fig"/>; <xref linkend="a"/>; <xref
> linkend="b"/></para>
>     <figure xml:id="fig">
>         <title>Main figure</title>
>         <mediaobject xml:id="a">
>             <textobject><simpara>A</simpara></textobject>
>         </mediaobject>
>         <mediaobject xml:id="b">
>             <textobject><simpara>B</simpara></textobject>
>         </mediaobject>
>     </figure>
> </article>
>
> My most natural solution would be to allow figure within figure, i.e. things
> like this:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <?xml-model href="http://docbook.org/xml/5.1/rng/docbook.rng"
> schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?>
> <?xml-model href="http://docbook.org/xml/5.1/sch/docbook.sch"
> type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
> <article xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
>     xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" version="5.1">
>     <title>AE</title>
>     <para>Ref: <xref linkend="fig"/>; <xref linkend="a"/>; <xref
> linkend="b"/></para>
>     <figure xml:id="fig">
>         <title>Main figure</title>
>         <figure>
>             <title>A</title>
>             <mediaobject xml:id="a">
>                 <textobject><simpara>figure</simpara></textobject>
>             </mediaobject>
>         </figure>
>         <figure>
>             <title>B</title>
>             <mediaobject xml:id="b">
>                 <textobject><simpara>figure</simpara></textobject>
>             </mediaobject>
>         </figure>
>     </figure>
> </article>
>
> Do you have a better way of encoding subfigures (with cross-referencing) or
> is it completely out of scope for current DocBook (in which case I can
> submit a PR for DocBook 5.2)?
>
> Thank you in advance!
> Thibaut Cuvelier



-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk