Re: Status of Extended XLinks (1:n Relationships)?

Dave Pawson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.docbook.misc
Message-ID <CAEncD4f=bskXynaxad_bC+HhnOY9F5XV1S+cm=0fAtK36gK7Jw@mail.gmail.com>
On 25 November 2017 at 14:50, Thomas Schraitle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, 25. November 2017, 15:37:06 CET schrieb Dave Pawson:
>> HTML display? Is there any convention on 1:n link display?
>
> I don't know. Probably not. :-)
>
> HTML is important, but we shouldn't limit ourselves to just this format. There
> are many others.

(my view) - None more so than HTML?


>
> Before we can discuss the presentation, shouldn't we discuss the markup first?
> There are so many possibilities.
>
> Maybe we can learn from DITA? How does DITA solves this?

I don't know... but I am -1 on DITA.

>
>
>> Useful... but would need to be understood?
>
> Yes, it needs understood first. That's why I've added the first list item
> ("Decide on a markup how to express 1:n relationships"). :)

Sort of 'dictionary' markup?

<key>
   <target dest='link'/>
    <target dest='link'/>

etc?




-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.