Re: Status of Extended XLinks (1:n Relationships)?
Dave Pawson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEncD4f=bskXynaxad_bC+HhnOY9F5XV1S+cm=0fAtK36gK7Jw@mail.gmail.com> |
On 25 November 2017 at 14:50, Thomas Schraitle <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Am Samstag, 25. November 2017, 15:37:06 CET schrieb Dave Pawson: >> HTML display? Is there any convention on 1:n link display? > > I don't know. Probably not. :-) > > HTML is important, but we shouldn't limit ourselves to just this format. There > are many others. (my view) - None more so than HTML? > > Before we can discuss the presentation, shouldn't we discuss the markup first? > There are so many possibilities. > > Maybe we can learn from DITA? How does DITA solves this? I don't know... but I am -1 on DITA. > > >> Useful... but would need to be understood? > > Yes, it needs understood first. That's why I've added the first list item > ("Decide on a markup how to express 1:n relationships"). :) Sort of 'dictionary' markup? <key> <target dest='link'/> <target dest='link'/> etc? -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk