Re: Which DocBook element to use for NICs?
David O'Brien <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We're currently on 4.5 (we're slow) but will go to 5 eventually. Modifying the DTD is not an option for us, and we're also supposed to limit the number of different elements we use. <hardware> is not on our currently supported list although I can see a case for it now. cheers David On 04/09/2018 08:38 PM, Dave Pawson wrote: > Nothing obvious in https://tdg.docbook.org/tdg/5.2/ > > Not sure 'hardware' or ports are included in db? > > Extend db? Easy enough to do? > > HTH > > On 9 April 2018 at 11:10, David O'Brien <[email protected]> wrote: >> Anyone have any suggestions? >> >> e.g., eth0, docker0, eno1 >> >> Thanks >> -- >> -- David Acupuncture - what's the point?
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEt8foe2pCEdZ4nsfrK9JZN+ky1n8FAlrLZBcACgkQK9JZN+ky 1n+8nw/+PrlADJqG88W+Coxff3Bbvb2mKQp1l4Tub8p8Kqrmr5ZuCUbD/ReJAIFx Id/nK5YornfL7GoBcXunHC6e9otYdm2z92W1gux9AdpyzLlz5M80KmKEFnnGS5CV jQj6xMNB/fQOgvdYjZMuFaI4BBYHhX8F5/97+wnEfCTtRoyUdvM68LUEsTooRuuz RAaihBWY5krpgGjd9dDjC+Km2cJqs7kGClRwgJm7NbqUgI9BFmZK9WIiw2a4/Izw 5b0xzZqbTnIPCtZEAynt8X83uiiF0xNqNYhQub6lE7PFWlxZBzETj/FKVLEwpcc9 ya8HMfogh058rCotRVvkbQ8VEeUQbXfZqarEJcHurJNbEF9PZw07JLSFfu9WfMHw hJePH3VAgZprBAaWoMj5v7ffSeeiSjjvT4aFTKvtPbLGlN+VqmL+3COVk8z7ZuWr kLb5t2ivswGC8iAV5HaXOhVbHBVk9eC3FUeieHtlRUYrNd8AbBwCbzSHzpMZs1Cr y97or358YiibTVq/LP5M9MiORh4YprBNgu22y/GXy3sR/tJLnzI9uuV1cDvQDVST 0bVeODbJP3dW2c3ipgzbc1udlV1AF9mkS1wF8CgC5qjKNDGEVNKDAST+mGx/HnlR pkxVZFcICkRQS8fMDna0XPKYPXhc4yhvMUCJMrNVM3sIlHVdfBA= =aIeO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----