Re: Which DocBook element to use for NICs?
Norman Walsh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas Schraitle <[email protected]> writes: >> You can use class attribute to be more specific about value inside >> systemitem. If there is nothing suitable for you in this list, you can >> still use rola attribute and invent your own types, e.g. >> >> <systemitem role="interface">eth0</systemitem> > > An alternative notation would be: > > <systemitem class="other" otherclass="interface">eth0</systemitem> I think that would be “better”, but I also think > What about adding "interface" to the available values of the class > attribute for future DocBook versions? Is a perfectly reasonable idea. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <[email protected]> | The formula 'Two and two make five' is http://nwalsh.com/ | not without its attractions.--Dostoevsky
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 162 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAlrjLhQACgkQOyltUcwYWju1XQCgjLKzzdarv8lbcXyvdcHJfsjS +YsAnjU+9drJL5Nr2yryLmwlV4NOUTw/ =IZOI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----