Re: DTD from extended RNC
Dave Pawson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEncD4chyQ3eyv3syJ58M=X8ev5DXMXhrnL=wjU+h2UO7V-VLA@mail.gmail.com> |
On 21 May 2018 at 16:27, N. Raghavendra <[email protected]> wrote: > > Regarding a DTD for my extended schema, I have a few queries: > > 1. How difficult is it to start with a DocBook XML DTD, and extend it by > adding the elements I had mentioned, to get a new XML DTD? Can be done... I have not used a DTD for ... 10 years? > > 2. Is it possible to get a DTD for 5.1? The spec of DocBook 5.1 at > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/docbook/v5.1/os/docbook-v5.1-os.html > > says, "The Technical Committee provides the DocBook 5.1 schema in other > schema languages, including W3C XML Schema and an XML DTD, but the RELAX > NG Schema is the normative schema." The distribution at > > https://docbook.org/xml/5.1/ > > does not seem to have an XML DTD. DTD is yesterdays tool? > > 3. Is it important to use an editor that understands RELAX NG? I think so. YMMV? Sorry, many of us moved to RNG/C a long time ago, as a much better tool for more complex schemas? -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.