Re: Re: [docbook-apps] Biblioentry markup standards -- identifying the type of entry
Peter Flynn <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:22:10 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/06/2020 09:12, Norman Tovey-Walsh wrote: > The bibliography stuff is a bit of a mess. It was originally cribbed > from the Majour[1] standard in the very early 90’s, I believe, on the > assumption that reuse was better than reinvention. I’m not sure what > happened to Majour after that. I think it got dropped on the floor. But it influenced lots of bib DTDs. > There’s *A LOT* of variation in how citations are published. And a lot of hypercritical readers who will find that misplaced comma :-) > <biblioentry> > <citetitle pubwork="book">DocBook: The Definitive Guide</citetitle> That's a nice idea. > I think the title in a bibliography entry is more semantically a > title citation than a title, so that’s my preference anyway. (In > DocBook, a <title> is usually the the title of a thing, and that’s > not what is going on in a bibliography.) Not sure about that. If the entry is for a book, the title element probably need to be the title of the book, not the title of something else. Peter -- I've been married so long I'm on my third bottle of Tabasco — Susan Vass