Re: Term DTD vs Schema in "DocBook V5.x XML DTD"

Norm Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Aug 2020 19:34:49 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.text.docbook.misc
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Thomas Schraitle <[email protected]> writes:
> Additionally, even if we had a DTD for all versions, this wouldn't work 
> either. We have several, different schemas: DTD, RNG, SCH, NVDL, and XSD (5.0 
> only). So I politely ask, if we could change that to a better term? What 
> about:
>
>   DocBook V5.x XML Schemas
>
> Would that work? :) Thanks!

Yes, that makes total sense. I expect the bit of infrastructure that
builds those pages hasn’t been updated since, uh, well, uh, since they
were DTDs! I’ll see what I can do.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norman Tovey-Walsh <[email protected]>
https://nwalsh.com/

> One must not confuse scientific fact with scientific misconception.
> They're more or less opposites, of course. But a scientific
> misconception, if widely believed, creates a kind of truth of its own.
> This doesn't seem to make sense, but it's true.--Adam Felber

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832 B)