Re: Standard schema or format for product sheet

Vincent Bouttard <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:26:21 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.text.docbook.misc
Organization Optique Unterlinden
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> I don't think anyone here would disagree with that in concept. For 
> technical descriptions, DocBook is by far the most general schema, so 
> in the absence of a specialist schema, adapting DocBook looks like a 
> good move, as Gerrit described.

I think this is the best way. I will continue with DocBook, even if I 
have to adapt it in some points.
I have to look at the link about epischema pointed by Gerrit in his 
answer, too.

>
> UN/CEFACT/EDIFACT, UNECE, and several other organisations do business 
> schemas, possibly including product data, but these are *vast* 
> packages and probably gross overkill for what you want to do. Right 
> now, anyway.

Yes. This approach is not really suited to little companies like mine.

Vincent