Re: Standard schema or format for product sheet
Vincent Bouttard <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:26:21 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | Optique Unterlinden |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I don't think anyone here would disagree with that in concept. For > technical descriptions, DocBook is by far the most general schema, so > in the absence of a specialist schema, adapting DocBook looks like a > good move, as Gerrit described. I think this is the best way. I will continue with DocBook, even if I have to adapt it in some points. I have to look at the link about epischema pointed by Gerrit in his answer, too. > > UN/CEFACT/EDIFACT, UNECE, and several other organisations do business > schemas, possibly including product data, but these are *vast* > packages and probably gross overkill for what you want to do. Right > now, anyway. Yes. This approach is not really suited to little companies like mine. Vincent